Human Development and High Technology
Some simple assumptions – often fashioned by leaders and supported by the direct – exercise the collective conscience of the led in so far as they stimulate a willed development. The evolution is generally superior but not always civilized. The premises in question are of the kind: “Our level of technological progress is next to none. Upon attaining this level, we also need to prepare society for peace, and also to ensure that the peace, technology has to be revised to boost the coverage of warfare.” The technological advancement that’s pushed in this direction sets a dangerous precedent for other societies which fear a danger to their individual sovereignties. They’re pushed to also nurture war technology.
From the domain of civilization, this manner of growth isn’t praiseworthy, nor can it be morally justifiable. As it isn’t morally justifiable, it’s socially irresponsible. A review of the premises will reveal it is the final one that introduces a difficulty. The final assumption is that the conclusion of the two previous premises but isn’t in any way. What it reveals is a deduced decision, and being so, it fails to be thought of as a decision from a logically prepared head, at least in the time where it had been deduced.
A society that advances based on the preceding presuppositions – and particularly based on the illogical end – has sent the mind of non-negotiable excellence to its own people. Altogether, the power of fire dictates the speed of human behavior. Whether constructive engagements or willed ventures, the principle of equality fails to operate just due to the excellence syndrome which grips with the leader and the led. Along with another society which won’t share from the collective sensibilities or fire of these society has, from the anticipated perception, become a possible or real enemy and confronts confrontation on all probable fronts.
Most of what we understand about the current world, of course, through the media, is dominated by advanced technology. Societies having the most of these techniques will also be, again and again, claimed to be the most complex. It’s not just their improvement that lifts them into the pinnacle of power, excellence, and popularity. They’re also able to utilize technology to simplify and proceed ahead of comprehension of nature and life in another direction, a direction that will remove, as far as you can, a previous connection between nature and life that has been, in several respects, mysterious and dangerous. This last point doesn’t automatically signify that technological progress is a marker of a superior civilization.
Everything we will need to be aware of is that civilization and technology aren’t conjugal terms. Civilized men and women might have an innovative technology or they might not have it. Civilization isn’t merely an issue of science and technology or specialized infrastructure, or, the marvel of buildings; it also has to do with all the moral and psychological reflexes of individuals in addition to their degree of social connectedness in their society and outside. It’s in the overall behavior makeup of people who all kinds of physical structures can be generated, as well as the subject of science and technology. Therefore, the type of bridges, streets, buildings, heavy machines, amongst others, that we’re able to view in a society can inform, in a general manner, the behavioral pattern of these folks. Behavioral patterns may also tell a lot about the degree to which the natural environment was used for infrastructural activities, science, and technology. Most importantly, the behavioral pattern may tell a whole lot about the senses and comprehension of the people about other individuals.
I really do believe – and, I believe, most individuals think – upon accelerating the speed of infrastructural activities and technology, the environment must recede in its naturalness. Once progressing technology (and its own structures or thoughts ) competes with all the green environment for distance, this environment which homes trees, flowers, grass, all sorts of fish and animals must shrink in size. However the rise of people, the constant human craving for quality life, the necessity to restrain life without relying on the erratic state of the natural environment prompt using technology. Technology shouldn’t pose an unwarranted danger to the natural environment. It’s the abuse of technology that’s in question. Even though society could justly use technology to increase-beginning, its individuals also need to ask: “how much technology do we have to protect the natural environment? Any advanced technology factors to the elegance of your brain, and it suggests the natural environment was cavalierly tamed.